Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tracy Sanders's avatar

The country has been pro-pharmaceutical intervention since at least the 1940s because there was no end of profit behind it. Successful therapies that require no doctor and require no prescription have been aggressively, undeservedly discredited by the same pharmaceutical-captured agencies you cite. On this topic, your position cannot be supported. We are currently living in a world where the pharmaceutical companies are colluding with government agencies to reduce life expectancy. The reduction in life expectancy is what they want. It provides an opportunity to further extract wealth by treating people with chronic disease and steal the wealth of the entire family transferring it upwards to parasites. Dead people also don't collect social security. Social security is a government liability. Ezekiel Emanuel supported the initiative by building the Complete Lives System. Anyone over 50 has supposedly had a complete life already.

The biological warfare you call vaccines are a key component of that effort.

Right now, a mother is on trial for murdering her babies in Colorado, though all evidence substantiates the vaccines killed them. Until there is an equal number of decades of evidence proving that vaccines are actually safe and effective instead of unlimited harm biologics combined with a liability shield, they need to be fought not advocated for. With these biologics, there can be no informed consent. The ingredients are tainted, hidden, uninspected, and no true placebo trials have ever been conducted.

If vaccines were safe and effective, then why does the liability shield need to exist? I expect no answer because the truth is self-evident.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?